Olympic Airways v. Hanson was a lawsuit brought following the death on 4 January 1998 of Dr Abid Hanson, a passenger on Olympic Airways Flight 417 from Cairo, Egypt, via Athens, Greece, to New York City in the United States. Hanson died following exposure to secondhand smoke.
Hanson, who had a "history of recurrent anaphylactic reactions" and sensitivity to secondhand smoke, had requested a non-smoking seat. When the family boarded the Boeing 747 aircraft in Athens, the people found that the assigned seats were three rows ahead of the economy-class smoking area; there was no partition between the smoking and non-smoking section. The family repeatedly requested a seat further away from the smoking section but the flight attendant, Maria Leptourgou, would not move the passenger to any of the eleven other unoccupied seats on the aircraft. The passenger felt a reaction to the smoke and died several hours later despite his doctor's aid.
Video Olympic Airways v. Hanson
Background
Smoking on international flights was already seen as a safety issue by the International Civil Aviation Organization's aviation medicine section, which had sought an outright ban by 1996.
Maps Olympic Airways v. Hanson
Legal case
Hanson's death resulted in the Olympic Airways v. Hanson, 540 U.S. 644 (2004) case in the Supreme Court of the United States. Before the case reached the Supreme Court, the lower courts had decided as follows:
The District Court found petitioner liable for Dr. Hanson's death, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed, concluding that, under the definition in [Air France v. Saks, 470 U.S. 392 (1985)] of "accident," the flight attendant's refusal to re-seat Dr. Hanson was clearly external to him, and unexpected and un-usual in light of industry standards, Olympic policy, and the simple nature of the requested accommodation.
On initial appeal, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unanimously affirmed the finding of the District Court that Leptourgou's actions not only met the definition of "accident" under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention, but also rose to the level of being "wilful misconduct" under Article 25; by passing that threshold, it removed a $75,000 cap on damages.
The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals award of US$700,000 in compensatory damages against Olympic Airways, holding that: "the conduct here constitutes an 'accident' under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed."
See also
- Inflight smoking
References
Source of article : Wikipedia
0 Comments